June 8, 2025; Los Angeles, CA, USA; Protesters gather near Union Station and the Federal Courthouse in Los Angeles on June 8, 2025. Clashes between law enforcement and protesters intensified on Sunday as California National Guard troops arrived in Los Angeles to quell demonstrations against President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown, a move that the state's Democratic governor has called unlawful. Mangatory Credit: Trevor Hughes-USA TODAY Network via Imagn
Los Angeles, California – A federal judge is expected to rule Friday on a lawsuit that challenges the legality of immigration enforcement tactics used across Los Angeles in recent weeks. The lawsuit, filed by immigrant advocacy groups including Public Counsel and the ACLU, accuses federal agents of targeting communities of color with unconstitutional tactics, denying detainees access to legal counsel, and holding them in inhumane conditions.
The filing seeks an immediate temporary restraining order to halt the use of so-called “roving patrols” — mobile units of immigration officers who, plaintiffs allege, are detaining people without warrants or probable cause. The complaint centers on a pattern of indiscriminate arrests in locations ranging from street corners to day laborer pickup sites, described by advocates as a climate of fear that has engulfed large swaths of Southern California.
One attorney for the plaintiffs explained, “This case is not about immigration enforcement. It’s about whether our Constitution still applies to the people who live here — regardless of where they were born.”
At the heart of the lawsuit are the stories of three immigrants detained during recent raids, alongside U.S. citizens allegedly caught up in the sweeps. Among them is Brian Gavidia, a Los Angeles native, who was captured in a widely shared video being pinned to a fence by masked federal agents while protesting that he was born in East L.A. According to the lawsuit, Gavidia had shown his ID, but was still detained.
In court, U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong expressed skepticism of the federal government’s defense, which emphasized “reasonable suspicion” and the “totality of the circumstances” as legal justification for their operations. Judge Frimpong signaled a desire for greater specificity about how the government distinguishes lawful enforcement from unconstitutional policing.
Federal officials have categorically denied the allegations. In a statement, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin rejected the claim that racial profiling played a role, calling it “disgusting and categorically false.” She added that all detainees receive medical care, meals, and legal access.
But the complaint tells a more harrowing story. Detainees, the plaintiffs argue, have been pressured to sign voluntary departure papers without being advised of their rights, and are being held in what they describe as “dungeon-like” detention centers, some reportedly forced to sleep on the floor and drink from toilets.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has positioned the city as a frontline defender of constitutional rights. “We will not be intimidated,” she said earlier this week. “Los Angeles will be the example of how people who believe in American values will stand together.”
The legal action arrives as the Trump administration ramps up immigration enforcement nationwide. More than 55,000 migrants have been taken into custody in the past six months, according to federal data. In Los Angeles, that pressure is playing out on farms, in homes, and at bus stops — and now, in court.
