WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 06: U.S. President Donald Trump gestures toward supporters as he departs the White House on June 06, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump is departing the White House for a weekend trip to Bedminster, New Jersey. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
California – The Trump administration filed a federal lawsuit Monday challenging California’s new ban on most law enforcement officers wearing masks during operations, setting up a legal fight over public safety, federal authority, and the visibility of law enforcement during immigration enforcement actions.
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, argues that the state’s law — enacted in September in direct response to masked federal immigration raids in Los Angeles — violates the Constitution by attempting to regulate the conduct of federal officers. The law is scheduled to take effect in January.
In its filing, the Department of Justice said face coverings are essential to protecting the identities of federal agents as the Trump administration continues large-scale immigration sweeps across the country. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement that masks shield officers from harassment, threats, and potential retaliation. “They do not deserve to be doxed or harassed simply for carrying out their duties,” Bondi said. “California’s anti-law enforcement policies discriminate against the federal government and are designed to create risk for our agents.”
California officials see it differently. Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, signed the law after months of highly visible immigration arrests by federal agents wearing ski masks, neck gaiters, or tactical face coverings without badge numbers or identifying insignia. Critics said the tactics made it nearly impossible for residents to know who was conducting the arrests — and whether those operations were even legitimate.
“It’s like a dystopian sci-fi movie,” Newsom said at the time. “Unmarked cars, people in masks, people quite literally disappearing. Immigrants have rights, and we have the right to stand up and push back, and that’s what we’re doing here today.”
The law, believed to be the first of its kind in the country, bars most facial coverings for federal and local officers conducting official business in California. It includes exceptions for undercover work, medical masks, and certain tactical gear but does not apply to state police. There is currently no federal policy governing when agents can conceal their faces during arrests, though historically the practice has been limited to undercover operations intended to protect ongoing investigations.
The growing use of masked federal agents in public arrests has alarmed some former immigration officials. John Sandweg, who served as acting ICE director under President Barack Obama, told CNN earlier this year that the shift carries serious risks for both officers and the public.
“The risk is really obvious,” he said. “You’re sitting there and all of a sudden a bunch of masked men run out and are grabbing someone on the street. There are good, well-intentioned bystanders who might think they’re witnessing a kidnapping.”
California lawmakers echoed those concerns while passing the ban, with several arguing that visible identification is a basic safeguard in a democracy — especially when arrests involve civilians in public spaces.
Now, with the Trump administration suing to halt the law before it takes effect, the dispute sets up a broader question: how much control states have over the conditions under which federal officers operate within their borders.
A hearing date has not yet been scheduled.
