
US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump are greeted by California Governor Gavin Newsom upon arrival at Los Angeles International Airport in Los Angeles, California, on January 24, 2025, to visit the region devastated by the Palisades and Eaton fires. (Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)
Sacramento, California – California’s ambitious high-speed rail project now faces a legal and political standoff that could determine the fate of one of the most significant infrastructure efforts in the country. On Wednesday, Governor Gavin Newsom announced that the state has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its decision to revoke $4 billion in federal funding for the project—money that state officials argue is critical to keeping construction on track and avoiding a landscape littered with half-finished structures.
The lawsuit, filed by the California High-Speed Rail Authority, accuses the federal government of engaging in “petty, political retribution,” driven by former President Donald Trump’s personal animosity toward both California and the rail project itself. The suit argues that the decision to withdraw the funding was not based on project performance or financial mismanagement, but rather a calculated political move aimed at undermining the state’s progressive agenda.
Governor Newsom called the funding cut a “heartless attack” on the Central Valley, where much of the active construction is taking place. “This is America’s only high-speed rail project under construction,” Newsom said. “Real jobs and real livelihoods are at stake.”
At the time of the federal revocation, California’s rail project had moved well beyond the planning phase. The state is currently laying track along a 171-mile corridor through the Central Valley and has already completed more than 50 major structures—including bridges, overpasses, and viaducts—while guideway construction spans over 60 miles. These aren’t abstract commitments on paper; they’re concrete realities, rising from farmland and freeway interchanges.
The lawsuit lands at a moment of both vulnerability and momentum. In the last year, the project has completed environmental reviews along the 463-mile stretch from Los Angeles to the Bay Area, finished the electrification of Caltrain, and moved forward with station design and trainset procurement. More than 15,000 jobs have been created through the effort, many of them union positions in economically fragile regions of the state.
Newsom has pitched high-speed rail as central to his “build more, faster” agenda—a blend of climate resilience, economic development, and 21st-century infrastructure that he argues the federal government should support, not sabotage.
But the loss of $4 billion could stall construction indefinitely, leaving behind ghost-town remnants of a project that once promised to revolutionize how Californians travel. Viaducts without trains, platforms without passengers, tracks that begin but go nowhere. Whether the courts will restore funding remains uncertain. What’s clear is that the political fight over California’s rail future is far from over—and its outcome could determine whether high-speed rail becomes a symbol of progress or unfinished ambition.