
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 06: U.S. President Donald Trump gestures toward supporters as he departs the White House on June 06, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump is departing the White House for a weekend trip to Bedminster, New Jersey. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Washington D.C. – What began as a protest against immigration raids in Los Angeles has quickly evolved into a defining clash between state and federal authority. President Donald Trump, bypassing Governor Gavin Newsom and invoking sweeping language about national security, authorized the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops to California — without the state’s consent.
It’s a bold assertion of presidential power, one that has reignited debate about executive overreach and the politicization of immigration enforcement. While protests in Los Angeles were initially scattered and largely peaceful following Friday’s immigration raids, the federal response appears to have intensified the unrest. As demonstrators returned to the streets over the weekend, the president’s rhetoric grew sharper. On social media, Trump described Los Angeles as being “invaded and occupied” by “violent, insurrectionist mobs,” and ordered three top cabinet officials to “liberate” the city.
The president declined to say whether he would invoke the 1807 Insurrection Act, which grants authority to deploy troops domestically to suppress rebellion. But he made clear that troop mobilization was already underway, promising, “We’re going to have troops everywhere.”
California authorities did not request federal assistance, nor did they indicate a lack of capacity to handle the situation. Nevertheless, the administration pushed forward. At a press conference, Trump declared, “Nobody’s going to spit on our police officers. Nobody’s going to spit on our military,” although there is no verified report of such an incident occurring.
The decision marks one of the most significant federal interventions in a U.S. city in recent memory. The last time a president bypassed a governor to deploy National Guard troops was in 1965, when Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights marchers in Alabama — a move driven by an effort to uphold civil liberties, not suppress protest.
Trump’s aides and allies have portrayed the moment as a long-awaited reckoning. “This is a fight to save civilization,” Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, posted online. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich echoed that sentiment, casting the confrontation in stark terms of law and order versus lawlessness.
For the president, the escalating situation in California may represent more than a crisis — it is a campaign narrative taking shape in real time, centered on immigration, authority, and a deepening divide between red and blue America.